If you are interested, visit Darrin’s TNG website at The Next Generation of Genealogy Sitebuilding(©”TNG”).Ĭurrent version: 12.0 | Price: $32.99 USD | May, 1, 201 |ĭuring the years my genealogy website grew bigger and bigger, the HTML pages started piling up with hundreds of individual pages. There is no limit to the number of names that can be in the program’s database. Instead, your information is stored in MySQL database tables and dynamically displayed in attractive fashion with PHP (a scripting language). It is a powerful way to manage and display your genealogy data on your own web site, all without generating a single page of static HTML. TNG is a powerful PHP/MySQL script that acts as a central repository for all your genealogy research and allows others to view and search through your records. TNG runs on most any normal Web server, including Windows, Linux, UNIX, and Macintosh. TNG ( The Next Generation of Genealogy Sitebuilding) was designed by Darrin Lythgoe. Mattie Damme, inventarisatie van de boedel.Archief Goes, Biezelinge, Nisse, Heinkenszand.(I'm not even sure how that might look unless you create duplicate copies of the family in both trees, which will make it difficult to maintain data consistency)Īll of these issues will disappear if you simply merge the "red" and "blue" trees, and use webtrees' existing privacy rules to control what each user is allowed to view.Ĭonnexion ou Créer un compte pour participer à la conversation. Thus data will be unexpectedly missing - unless you create a second "symbolic link" from "blue" Bob to his family in the red tree. Since Bob's family with Alice is part of the "red" tree, it will be missing - along with the children of Alice and Bob. This bypasses webtrees' privacy rules by allowing a non-member (of the "blue" tree) to see potentially restricted data.īut consider what happens if a member of the "blue" tree attempts to run a Descendants report for Bob's parents (or grandparents). Similarly, a member of the "red" tree could run the Ancestors report for their children and see many generations of people from the "blue" tree. In that case, a member of the "red" tree can go to Alice and Bob's family page and see Bob's parents in the "blue" tree. Clearly this is not a good solution.Ĭonversely, suppose you pick option 2, so there is a "link" from this "red" tree family to the individual Bob in the "blue" tree. In this case, what happens if you wish to run an Ancestors report for one of the children of Alice and Bob? Since only Alice's side of the family is part of the "red" tree, the report will not show any of their paternal ancestors - unless you go further and add duplicate records for all of Bob's family members in the "red" tree. Suppose you pick option 1, so the family includes Alice and the duplicate copy of Bob your created in the "red" tree. You could include Bob using your imaginary "symbolic link" to the other tree, i.e., the family members are "Alice" and "blue -> Bob", so there is only one copy of the data about Bob stored in the "blue" tree.(Following the suggestions of #norwegian_sardines, it would be wise to define the "blue" tree as a source within the "red" tree to explain where you got the data about Bob.) You could create a duplicate record for Bob in the "red" tree, containing data copies from Bob's record in the "blue" tree.Let's suppose you create the new family in the "red" tree, which includes existing individual Alice. However, since Alice and Bob belong to separate trees, you must create the new family in one of the existing trees. If there was a single tree, you would create one new family containing both Alice and Bob. ![]() Suppose you have two existing trees and an individual Alice, who belongs to the "red" tree, marries an individual Bob, who belongs to the "blue" tree. That sounds like a distinction without difference. ![]() I think you are trying to "link" two trees without "merging" them. So when adding an existing wife - or other person - to a family the first thing would be to select the correct tree, and then individual WIFE the XREF be used to link to another tree, and therefore an existing individual? In the family record the definition - get5.5 - for wife is Just seen this, as I would like to be able to link to another tree to find an existing person.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |